“In the wake of reactions provoked by the recent Decree from the Congregation for Bishops lifting the excommunication on the four prelates of the Society of St. Pius X, and with reference to declarations denying and reducing the Shoah pronounced by Bishop Williamson, a member of that society, it is felt appropriate to clarify certain aspects of the issue:

1. Remission of the excommunication

“As has previously been explained, the Decree from the Congregation for Bishops, dated 21 January 2009, was an act by which the Holy Father benignly responded to repeated requests from the superior general of the Society of St. Pius X.

“His Holiness wished to remove an impediment that hindered the opening of a door to dialogue, and he now awaits a similar readiness to be expressed by the four bishops, in complete adherence to the doctrine and discipline of the Church.

“The extremely serious penalty of excommunication ‘latae sententiae’, which these bishops incurred on 30 June 1988, formally announced on 1 July of the same year, was a consequence of their illegitimate ordination by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre.

“The remission of the excommunication has freed the four bishops from a serious canonical penalty, but it has not altered the juridical position of the Society of St. Pius X which, at the present time, enjoys no canonical recognition within the Catholic Church. Even the four bishops, though released from excommunication, have no canonical function in the Church and cannot legally exercise a ministry within her“.

2. Tradition, doctrine and Vatican Council II

“An indispensable condition for any future recognition of the Society of St. Pius X is their full recognition of Vatican Council II and of the Magisterium of Popes John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI.

“As already affirmed in the Decree of 21 January 2009, the Holy See will not fail, in ways considered most appropriate, to join the parties concerned in a profound examination of outstanding issues, so as to be able to reach a full and satisfactory solution to the problems that gave rise to this painful split”.

3. Declarations concerning the Shoah

“Msgr. Williamson’s views on the Shoah are absolutely unacceptable, and firmly rejected by the Holy Father as he himself said on 28 January when, referring to that brutal genocide, he reiterated his complete and indisputable solidarity with our Brothers and Sisters who received the First Covenant, affirming that the memory of that terrible event must ‘induce humankind to reflect upon the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of man’, adding that the Shoah remains ‘an admonition for everyone against oblivion, negation and reductionism, because violence against a single human being is violence against all’.

“In order to be readmitted to episcopal functions within the Church, Bishop Williamson must absolutely, unequivocally and publicly distance himself from his views concerning the Shoah, which were unknown to the Holy Father at the moment he lifted the excommunication.

“The Holy Father asks all the faithful to accompany him in prayer, that the Lord may illuminate the path of the Church. May all pastors and faithful increase their commitment in support of the delicate and onerous mission of the Successor of the Apostle Peter, the ‘custodian of unity’ within the Church”.

SS/EXCOMMUNICATION BISHOPS/…VIS 090205 (580)

• Blessing of Water in Traditional and New Rite
• Article by Van Slyke

“Therefore, doctors and fathers of families have a duty to take recourse to alternative vaccines (if they exist), putting pressure on the political authorities and health systems so that other vaccines without moral problems become available. They should take recourse, if necessary, to the use of conscientious objection with regard to the use of vaccines produced by means of cell lines of aborted human foetal origin. Equally, they should oppose by all means (in writing, through the various associations, mass media, etc.) the vaccines which do not yet have morally acceptable alternatives, creating pressure so that alternative vaccines are prepared, which are not connected with the abortion of a human foetus, and requesting rigorous legal control of the pharmaceutical industry producers.”

In December 2008, this duty became an official instruction in the teaching, Dignitas Personae, in which the Holy See stated that: “everyone has the duty to make known their disagreement and to ask that their healthcare system make other types of vaccines available.”

We are uniting in a faithful response to the call of our Church by asking you to participate in two important petitions. As some of you may have heard, Merck has recently announced they will no longer provide their morally produced doses of measles and mumps vaccines, opting instead to only produce their tainted, MMR, which is produced using aborted fetal materials. A national petition is being sent to Merck requesting they respect the pro-life convictions of millions of families worldwide and continue to provide these doses.

A second effort is also underway that will force the pharmaceutical industry through legislative action to divulge whenever aborted fetal or embryonic materials are used in any medical product or vaccine so that moral alternatives may be selected in advance of purchase or immunization. The Fair Labeling and Informed Consent Act opens the market for competing companies that have agreed to provide ethical versions.

One such company founded last year for this purpose is Ave Maria Biotechnology. World-renowned Catholic scientist, Dr. Theresa Deisher (pronounced “dye-shur”) founder and CEO has agreed to provide moral alternatives for every vaccine that presently uses aborted fetal cell lines. The first will be a moral rubella vaccine, expected to be licensed and available in the US by the end of 2010 and an MMR within 5 years. But without the separate doses for measles and mumps in the interim, her efforts will be fruitless. And without the legislation, how will anyone know which vaccines are morally acceptable? There are numerous new vaccines under development for Flu, Avian Flu, and West Nile virus: some are morally produced, some are not.

The full document “Dignitas Personae” can be found online here.